Zero

When I first "fell" upon my discovery I went searching online for support only to find that there was actually NO talk about this whatsoever... besides that E.W. likes to do weird movies ...Specifically that he took special care with this particular film, which for some reason most assumed it to be of an unimportance.  (I'm guessing this because no one has come up with any idea why.) 

The Internet is full of talk about the video game mostly, which is something I still have never looked into.  All the information that seems to surface across various websites are quotes about Edgar Wright stylizing his films by placing hidden Easter eggs in them, so people could uncover them and point them out, trending as people do about trivia and whatever.

The merchandise and consumerism have almost created a wall between the deeper content laying hidden beneath the slapstick heroism performed by Michael Cera.  The role of his character is in a play, a musical drama if you will, and a shrouded and non-detectible one. 

Following the film, The video game's release takes precedence over other topics.  Fan's have looked more to the "spin-off" game as the continuation of the film's legacy. I have to say, those are just distractions to the real underpinnings this film was being envisioned as.

Underpinnings...
or maybe under-torpedo. Take your pick.

 Push play, skip ad

Push play at 7

If at first you don't succeed, try again

Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic

Take a look at this...

Why does it seem as though these titles are all getting switched up?
Which came first, the chicken or the Easter bunny?

Perhaps the first clue goes back to before the movie was made...
The comic, from which the film was based, features a title that alludes to another familiar title.  Turns out, Bryan Lee O'Malley's "coming of age" comic series, has Smashing Pumpkins references all over the place. That's because he was heavily influenced by them growing up.  Here's a helpful review with the author: http://www.fluxblog.org/2010/08/interview-with-scott-pilgrim-creator-bryan-lee-omalley/

In it he mentions briefly his influence by the band, as well as other life situations gathered around him at the time of writing his epic SP story.  He also talks about Edgar Wright getting a hold of it and beginning the brainstorming process that would eventually become his famous title.  This has no real relationship with what I'm going to tell you though.  It says nothing about the gigantic cock-up Edgar Wright was really dreaming about.

HAVE YOU SEEN SCOTT'S SHIRT?

That heart shaped SP doesn't stand for Scott Pilgrim, in case you didn't know.  That is one of the first logos for The Smashing Pumpkins if not THE logo.  Was it just intended to be a pun for Pilgrim's initials?  Or because of some wacky connect-the-dots symbolism Wright decided to throw in? 

I don't know about anyone else, but there's a cliff hanger here to me, a drop off, a silence hushed over with a finger neatly pressed against it's lips.  But then perhaps that's because I know something you don't.  If Edgar wanted to put parallels between his film and the original, then why leave it empty?  The problem is that there is discontinuity in referencing a reference from a comic book when there's a lack of content in the film.. I mean...  HE'S JUST WEARING THE SHIRT!

Perhaps fans have taken this in stride for only being a hint of the idolization Scott carries for the Smashing Pumpkins.  Or maybe it's just the director's simple stylization after the comic itself.  Either way, it's vague.

What I'm trying to point out is that, to the viewer, Edgar's only playing with the idea behind the comic series.  So far the relationship with the Pumpkins is comical, and I do mean that as only having the comic series to support any notion about the band.  It's Bryan Lee O'Malley's love affair with the Pumpkins that's shining through, but only on TWO T-SHIRTS?

There's no context without the dialog as is featured in the printed series.  By all rights it appears to be a shoddy attempt to link the two works together.  It's almost as if it's a joke.  A weak one.  If you read any kind of source from the Smashing Pumpkins side of the fence, you might find that to a real fan of their music, this is a turn off.

In the movie, Scott doesn't really talk about his interests.  Apart from being goo-goo for Ramona, there's not a whole lot to go on as to why Scott's a Smashing Pumpkins fan, or anything else attributed to them for that matter.  After knowing how much time Edgar spend on the set directly with the actor's parts, creating very specific parameters for them to work in, it would seem that he would of put a lot more though into it. 

Why would the director so explicitly include such references as vague as the ZERO shirt?  Is it to compliment Bryan O'Malley's love of the Pumpkins?  Is it because Scott like's Coke Zero so much?  Does the movie not deserve to get the same transcendental love experienced by the comic author when he was first writing the series?

Could it be that there's more to it than it appears?

Edgar Wright and the Infinite Sadness

For some reason, Edgar Wright has intentionally hidden the meaning behind an obscure relevance between the star of the film, Scott Pilgrim Vs the World and The Smashing Pumpkins.  The relationship of the comic, which the film is based upon, and the Pumpkin's hit album, Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness, has trickled into the foreground without detailing any secure intentions.  What those intentions were have remained somewhat of a mystery, and I am thus far the only person to my knowledge outside of "the know" who has figured it out.  Fans who have scavenged the film for the so-called Easter eggs Edgar repeatedly drops into his works have turned up only mild speculations.  This is a work in progress to reveal the true nature of Wright's take on O'Malley's tale of epicness.

It's been years, and although the hype has dissolved and interests have cooled, perhaps there is another scale to this supercharged, musical adventure.  One that just may bring the whole thing into another deeper, explosive and heart-driven manifestation that reveals a master-work far more worth the consideration than it's previous form.  The film itself is a remarkable piece of work, delving into an uncategorical genre and pulling off a unique view of a pre-to-post coming of age story.  But everything sought after to enjoy about this rouge film has been completely checked off, thus far, and all of the current reviews seem to be, at best, a weakly supported afterthought when it comes to any hidden languages appearing within the film.  What I want to do is start the fire on a major oversight that I believe the world has sadly accepted, so that this amazing discovery that I have been thrilled to uncover may finally make it's glorious début.

However, as hard as it was for me to believe that I was viewing solely by myself this phenomenon, it has been even harder still to piece together the combination of clues with the strange.  I discovered the reasons why this has escaped the public for so long; without fate playing a part, it would have never happened.  Because of the nature of the beast, there is no easy way to show anyone not personally nearby, so the best way that I can deliver the notion is by giving everyone the chance to pick it up for themselves.

Look at it this way, Edgar left a trail of egg shells for you to hunt, but he was more worried about the end result and so the pieces got half buried in the path.  I am simply going to point them out the best I can.  After getting such great satisfaction from discovering something of this magnitude myself, I'd hate to deprive anyone of the same opportunity anyway.